|
Childhood Poisonings: A cause for concern
Despite moves over the last few years to tighten regulations to prevent child poisonings, the incidence of accidental poisonings continue at an alarming rate. Examination of hospitalisation discharge data reveals that accidental poisoning is the second leading cause of child hospitalisation for unintentional injury for children aged 0-4 years. While these statistics paint a grim picture, they do not tell the whole story as it is estimated that some 90% of poisonings do not result in hospital admission. In the five-year period from 1994-1998, 5398 children aged 0-14 years were hospitalised as a result of accidental poisoning. This represents an average of 1079 children each year. Children aged 0-4 years are particularly over-represented. There is a sharp and steady decrease in the rate of accidental poisonings in children over 5 years.
A common point in the hospitalisation figures for all children aged 0-14 years reveals a bias in both gender and ethnicity, with males and European/Pakeha children being over-represented in the hospitalisation data2. The high rate of accidental poisoning in children under 5 years and particularly in children aged between 1 and 2, can be related to their developmental stage. The development of fine motor skills and increased mobility combined with their heightened curiosity, imitation of adult behaviour and a willingness to be separated from caregivers places these children at greater risk. Despite their young age, children have proved very resourceful often climbing onto shelves and cabinets to reach medicines or other toxins stored in high places, or alternatively seeking out medicines from bags belonging to visitors or family members. Other scenarios may involve an older sibling or playmate "sharing" the toxic substance with younger children. However there does appear to be a differential within the 0-4 age group, with children over 2 years of age being hospitalised more often for poisoning involving pharmaceutical drugs, while younger children were admitted more often for poisonings occurring as a result of ingesting cleaners or chemicals within the home3. There is a consensus within the available literature that a large proportion of accidental poisoning occurs when the child is removed from their routine environment. For example, while up to three-quarters of poisoning incidents occur at home, many of these are not in the family home but occur in the home of other caregivers. Typically these incidents involved toxic substances that were either in use, or were not returned to safe storage after use and were left lying around the home. As alarming as these poisonings statistics are, they fail to highlight the real tragedy that lies behind the figures. The hospitalisation rates do not illustrate the anguish of a small child, the terror and guilt of their parents or caregivers, nor the possible long-term consequences that may follow hospitalisation. This point is perhaps best illustrated by taking the example of a small child who has swallowed caustic automatic dishwasher powder, the consequences of which can result in oesophageal ulceration, which in the long-term leads to subsequent operations and bougienage (swallowing rubber tubes) to keep the oesophagus open. Given these types of scenarios the importance of child resistant closures cannot be underestimated, particularly in light of the fact that a recent study conducted by Safekids revealed that 80% of all poisoning cases involved children ingesting substances that were not contained in a child resistant closure.
Child resistant closures, or caps are a form of packaging that is designed to be significantly difficult for most children under 5 years of age to open within a reasonable amount of time. The greatest misconception surrounding child resistant caps is that they are childproof, when in fact they are merely designed to delay the time in which a child is able to open a toxic substance thereby increasing the probability of an adult intervening before the child ingests the contents. Child resistant packaging includes both non-recloseable and recloseable packaging. Non-recloseable packaging generally contains a single tablet in either aluminium foil (strip packaging) or opaque laminated plastic (blister packaging), and is not considered suitable for toxic substances. Recloseable packaging involves a container fitted with a recloseable top, or a child resistant cap such as the Palm-n-Turn or Clic-Loc variety. The use of child resistant caps has proven to be very effective in reducing the rates of accidental poisonings overseas, with many countries now adopting child resistant caps on a number of toxic substances. Currently in New Zealand, Pharmac funds child resistant caps for oral liquid preparations of the so-called "dirty dozen" medications. As of 1 November 1997 it is a requirement under the Pharmacy Contractors Section 51 Advice Notice that child resistant caps will be distributed with paracetamol, salicylates/NSAIDs, anticonvulsants, thyroxine, antidepressants, narcotics, beta-2-agonists, benzodiazepines, theophylline, iron salts, digoxin, cardiac drugs, phenothiazines including sedating antihistamines. While the introduction of child resistant caps to these pharmaceutical medications may be considered a start to reducing the rates of childhood poisonings, clearly they do not go far enough. Many of the tablets listed in these categories are not dispensed in foil or blister packaging, presenting significant risk to children. Clearly, as revealed by the hospitalisation data, there are a number of other pharmaceutical drugs that must be included if we are to make significant in-roads to reducing the alarming rate of accidental poisonings of our young children. The most effective ways of preventing childhood poisonings are those that require least effort by the consumer and put a barrier between children and the medicine. Child resistant packaging, such as safety caps, is an example of such a method. In addition to lobbying for their expansion to include other drugs, the current use of child resistant caps must coincide with other prevention strategies such as the education of caregivers and the public at large as to the importance of the safe storage of poisons around the home. Furthermore the National Poisons Centre must be given greater prominence in the community through the provision of an 0800 free phone number, so that parents may use the centre as their "first port of call" in an emergency situation.
REFERENCES 1. Royal New Zealand Plunket Society (1994). 2. Health Information Services, Ministry of Health 1994-1998. 3. Coyte, D. (1995), Article on Childhood Poisoning for NZ Practice Nurse, Communications Manager, Safekids.
Positive Changes to Road Safety Announced On June 8th 2000, the Minister of Transport and the Minister of Police announced a road safety package, which they believe will significantly reduce New Zealand's high rate of road injury and death. The package includes a more than doubled amount of funding being made available for community road safety projects. Half of the additional funding will be distributed in the usual way, through Local Authorities. The other half will be allocated through Regional LTSA Offices, and it will be targeted directly to Maori and Pacific Island community projects. The road safety package also includes an emphasis on enforcement, with a new 225 strong 'Highway Patrol', of dedicated traffic police to be established. Also announced was the following:
At a meeting of Mark Gosche, Minister of Transport and Judith Tizzard, Associate Minister of Transport and members of the road safety community in Auckland on Saturday 10th June, the news was extremely well received. The Ministers were keen to talk about the road safety package, but were equally keen to hear from those involved in grass roots road safety work. "It was unusual to attend a meeting with MPs and Ministers, and have them want to listen to you - rather than talk themselves," says Poni Dowding SafeKids Strategist who attended the meeting. "It was great to be able to tell them what is being done for road safety in communities out there. They were really interested! It was great!" Safekids is welcoming the changes, although we are asking for clarification on several issues from the Minister of Transport. Shelley Hanifan (Safekids Director) says: "Clearly we are delighted that more funding will be available to support the work of local communities in road safety. We hope that those allocating resources will ensure that child road safety is given the priority which it should be, based on the increased risk which children face in comparison to other age groups. We are also delighted that there will be a dedicated
'Highway Patrol', although the name suggests that these dedicated traffic officers will be
based on highways, rather than local roads. This may do little to reduce the rates of
child pedestrian and cyclist injuries, which tend to happen on local and feeder roads -
not 'highways'. We will be talking with Mark Gosche about this and asking for
clarification. Congratulations to Mark Gosche and the present government for making these positive moves, which will make a difference to road safety. We hope that you remain interested in community road safety work, and you will continue to listen to those doing the work.
Concerns over the NZ Health Strategy The New Zealand Health Strategy Discussion Document is now out for comment, and it can be found at www.moh.govt.nz/nzhs.html. The strategy calls for the health sector to work co-operatively towards common goals, rather than competing for the largest share of the health dollar. The NZ Health Strategy aims to set the direction for action on health by providing a unifying nation-wide framework within which the health sector will develop. These are worthy and lofty intentions! The document outlines a number of goals (9), with corresponding objectives (50 in total). The most important goal for injury prevention is goal number 7, of 'Fewer Injuries', although other goals also will affect safety and injury rates. The objectives aligned to the goal of 'Fewer Injuries' include the following:
It is positive to see that unintentional injury prevention has been recognised and prioritised within the Strategy, with three objectives written around it. However none of the unintentional injury objectives (the first three in the list) has been highlighted as an objective for immediate action. The only injury prevention objective highlighted for immediate action is the final objective outlined above, 'To reduce the incidence and impact of violence in interpersonal relationships, families, schools and communities'. The reasons for selecting this objective as a priority are given as follows within the strategy: "In many countries violence is recognised as a key public health issue. Child abuse, sexual violence, school bullying and elder abuse are all preventable forms of harm and social disruption." Those of you that are on the email discussion group will already have seen some discussion around this objective. The question was asked: Has the right objective been selected? The suggestion was made, which Safekids strongly supports, that a priority objective should be "To reduce the incidence and impact of injury on children and youth". It was suggested that this objective should be left broad to include both traffic injury and other unintentional injury and intentional injury also. Safekids is undertaking data analysis to look at this proposed objective further. We will provide further information via the injury prevention email network.
The main objective of the Information and Resource Centre is to increase the visibility of unintentional injury among children as an important issue, through the provision of relevant information, resources and services to a wide variety of clients. The Info Centre aims to provide a solid base of information about child unintentional injury and prevention in order to support the work of people involved in this field. Over the last few months, since March, 2000, Safekids has acquired over 100 different items which have been catalogued and added to the collection. Listed below is a small selection of some examples of these:
KIDSAFE WEEK INFORMATION AND PLANNING DAYS COMPLETED Safekids has just completed convening the Regional Kidsafe Week Information and Planning Days for Kidsafe Week 2000. Fifteen Regional Days were held throughout the country, with three new areas covered, these being Invercargill, the West Coast and Taupo. "It's been great getting out and meeting with the Kidsafe Week Coalition members," Sue reports. "Everyone is so enthusiastic and committed. The community networks are definitely the strength of Kidsafe Week!"
Re-vitalised Coalition in Greymouth
Hannah Macdonald, who works as a health promoter for Crown Public Health in Greymouth, has taken over the role of coalition co-ordinator, and is working with others from Westport, Reefton, and Hokitika on planning and implementing Kidsafe Week 2000. We wish the West Coast lots of luck and look forward to hearing how they get on! Please follow through to the next page
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||